I'm still confused as to why someone who looks so hard for cheaters is using the name of one. Sad actually asked me to ask Snowguy to have you banned because he thought you were him. In my experience cheaters aren't in a big hurry to get the ban train rolling.
(cheater) player1 - and his huge number of frags/points
PepsiCola I don't want to play Ping-Pong with you
You just did it, lol. You got called out for deflecting again - and you did what? Deflected that, with bs about ping-pong, ahah.
You really that stupid.
PepsiCola Gang of Gay-Clowns
Projecting much?
PepsiCola they have no arguments
Funny thing is: people gave you plenty of valid arguments, but you dismissed them all either by calling them "stupid" or by labeling them as "personal attack and trolling".
PepsiCola I already proved it's you who is a clown
In your imagination - sure. But your posts throughout the whole fucking forum prove otherwise.
PepsiCola and go away
You could follow that "advice" yourself, you know, it would be much better for everybody.
PepsiCola don't talk to me, don't talk about me
It's a public forum and you kinda all over it with your hilariously idiotic threads (like current one) and posts, so, either stop writing yourself or sit back and enjoy people's attention - we both know it's what you really want.
- Edited
Schizazoid You just did it, lol. You got called out for deflecting again - and you did what? Deflected that, with bs about ping-pong, ahah.
1) Your calling me out for defleting was baseless, because you didn't provide any examples. 2) What I did afterwards was not deflecting either, because I only provided you a link to my previous comment which contains relevant arguments which still hold up, because you did not present any new arguments since then, to which I could refer to. What is called deflecting, is what you're doing right now and what I've just destribed in 1) and 2) And now I just copy & paste your own words into your direction: "You really that stupid." I mean: it's you who is deflecting / playing Ping-Pong , but then you're trolling and saying it's me who is playing, the one who is playing Ping-Pong, is the one who lacks new arguments, which means in this case: you.
Schizazoid Funny thing is: people gave you plenty of valid arguments, but you dismissed them all either by calling them "stupid" or by labeling them as "personal attack and trolling".
Like described above, you're repeating yourself again, go read my previous replies.
Schizazoid In your imagination - sure.
Not in imagination, but by many relevant arguments, to which you didn't provide relevant counter-arguments.
Schizazoid But your posts throughout the whole fucking forum prove otherwise.
Not all posts, only the ones in which I was accusing players too much of cheating, I don't deny it, but on the other hand, at the same time I proved XX times with relevant arguments in many conversations what idiots / clowns each of you are, even bigger than me.
Schizazoid You could follow that "advice" yourself, you know, it would be much better for everybody.
But mostly for you, because you speak more than all the others of your buddies combined together.
Schizazoid It's a public forum and you kinda all over it with your hilariously idiotic threads (like current one) and posts, so, either stop writing yourself or sit back and enjoy people's attention - we both know it's what you really want.
The current thread and many other are over, so stop resurrecting / hijacking them, wigglewiggle was the last thread of such kind, and I don't create any such new threads / comments anymore except of some sarcasm ().
PepsiCola because you didn't provide any example
LMAO. The level of denial and stupidity you show every time is just embarassing. My previous message literally contains fresh example.
Besides, if I'm gonna link every single one of your deflections - that's gonna be quite an essay, lol, and nobody gonna bother reading it anyway, because people already have an idea of what you are.
PepsiCola What I did afterwards was not deflecting either
It literally is. Just because you didn't write it again but linked previous comment doesn't change the nature of your joke of an "argument".
You basically shat your pants and to people noting that you yell that it's their pants stinks, not yours - and claim this kind of behavior as "valid argumented point of view".
"I don't deny my posts are stupid" - says Gonzalez, after saying that his posts are not stupid. Lmao.
PepsiCola I proved XX times with relevant arguments in many conversations
You literally did not. You just posted incoherent rant about "ping-pong" and "projections". But the thing is: all of this applies to your own behavior and words.
PepsiCola But mostly for you, because you speak more than all the others of your buddies combined together.
Nah, it would benefit all equally. Btw, "they" ain't my "buddies" - "they" just saw you for what you are and proceeded to either replying in a fitting manner or ignoring your spectacle of clownish stupidity altogether.
PepsiCola The current thread and many other are over
Then why you still here and responding?
PepsiCola which contains relevant arguments which still hold up, because you did not present any new arguments since then, to which I could refer to
But I kinda did, you just in denial:
Schizazoid PepsiCola I will quote your own argument against you: " you start childish reflecting "no, it is you idiot, not me".
So it's you who is denying and ping-ponging, because a lack of new argumentation.
PepsiCola this is already the 3rd example of your "no, it is you, and not me", but it's funny it was you who called me behaving like that, you're a clown who is out of argumentationSo, let me get this straight: you quoted me on childish reflecting and proceeded to do just that: childish reflecting, again? Twice in a row, wow.
You keep outsmarting yourself so much that I almost feel sorry for adding my comments to that. The sad thing is: you don't even get it.
And it still stands and holds up pretty well.
- Edited
Schizazoid My previous message literally contains fresh example.
Okay, I missed your example, because I:
- either missed your colon " : " at the end of your sentence or I confused it with a dot " . "
- which caused me to thinking you stopped at that point,
- especially given a fact that you replied to your quoted example right below the example
- I mean I read comment like it was looking like: [quote & reply] [quote & reply] [quote & reply]
- wherein it has turned out to be: [quote & reply] [ quote & reply : & quote & reply ]
- it's like when one is programming and has missed a char or has been thinking it has been a different char, and then he has pressed Compile button, and his program has compiled without any warnings, as a result he has got a working app with a hidden bug he is not aware of, until some users (in this case: you) will report it to the issue tracker or tell the author about the bug, or when his app will crash or give strange results, such bugs/mistakes are easy to make, but hard to catch.
So I made a small gramatical mistake when reading your comment - I just overlooked a single char - a fucking colon, which caused me to understand your comment wrongly, which is just like doing a typo when writing, only that it was when reading in this case, and a typo was a reason enough for you to immediately laught at someone or call him names.
Now my hypothesis:
- either you are too stupid to figure out that my misunderstanding of a part of your comment was due to me missing a fucking colon in your comment
- or you are a clown, who lacks better arguments, than typos in reading/writing, to laught and call names at somebody, despite everybody, including you, makes typos from time to time
What is even more funny is that even despite a fact now I'm aware of your example, your example is a manipulation / trolling:
Schizazoid: idiocity PepsiCola : The idiocity is yours circus on wheels
Why? Because it doesn't contain arguments, you simply pulled a small part of my statement out of context, and by this manipulation you were trying to make my reply look like deflecting to you reply, but my full statement is longer and contain arguments, stop trolling / manipulating / trying to prove I deflect your messages, because I already proved it's you who invented Ping-Pong.
Schizazoid It literally is. Just because you didn't write it again but linked previous comment doesn't change the nature of your joke of an "argument".
Stop trolling and manipulating, you have modified my statement, the arguments are real/valid and the fact that I expressed them in a humorous way does not mean that they lose their validity, you have confused real arguments expressed in a humorous way, with a joke without arguments.
Schizazoid : You basically shat your pants and to people noting that you yell that it's their pants stinks, not yours - and claim this kind of behavior as "valid argumented point of view".
Stop trolling and manipulating, you have modified my statement, like I said: the argumentation is already in one of my previous comments, no need for me to copy & paste it here again, instead you go back and read my previous comments, and your example with pants is a perfect example of what you do, and not me, you are the genius who invented Ping-Pong.
Schizazoid : "I don't deny my posts are stupid" - says Gonzalez, after saying that his posts are not stupid. Lmao.
Stop trolling and manipulating, you have modified my statement, I said: "some of my posts"
Schizazoid : You literally did not. You just posted incoherent rant about "ping-pong" and "projections". But the thing is: all of this applies to your own behavior and words.
Stop deying the truth, and cherry-picking my comments, it's not only about it, because in many threads, in many comments, many times I just beat you and your buddies on arguments easily.
And stop your bullshit and rants about my Ping-Pong comment being "a bs" or "a rant", because like I already said: my Ping-Pong contains arguments, and when you call it "a bs" o "a rant" you didn't provide any counter-arguments, stop calling names, start providing arguments, or shut up.
Schizazoid : Nah, it would benefit all equally.
And where is the argument here? I see deflecting / Ping-Pong:
PepsiCola: It benfits mostly you, because (the argument): you talk more than all your buddies combined together
Schizazoid: Nah, it would benefit all equally, because (the argument): oh, holy shit ! there is no argument, only an empty space
But then you say it's me who is deflecting, no mam, you are the genius who invented Ping-Pong
Schizazoid : Btw, "they" ain't my "buddies"
"buddies" was half-jokingly said
Schizazoid : - "they" just saw you for what you are and proceeded to either replying in a fitting manner or ignoring your spectacle of clownish stupidity altogether.
They just saw me beating you on arguments, so they came to rescue you, hence why "buddies".
Schizazoid : Then why you still here and responding?
Because you are writing to me all the fucking time, despite I told you already 10 times to stop?
Our conversation was over, the thread was over, and I just pasted a video as a joke - nothing to which anyone should respond other way than sticking emojis or by short comments related to the video only, but then your double / duplicate: oOo replied with his private vendetta towards me, and then Oo.er replied with some crap to me trying to help you, but I beat them quickly, then jerc replied, but I only replied to his comment by sticking an emoji, and then you ressurected afterwards from the grave like a vampire / zombie and continued.
Schizazoid : So, let me get this straight: you quoted me on childish reflecting and proceeded to do just that: childish reflecting, again? Twice in a row, wow.
No, I just sent you back to my previous comments which contain arguments to which you still didn't refer.
Schizazoid : And it still stands and holds up pretty well.
I think it's a time to do a dontaion for a time machine for you that you can travel back in time to read my previous comments and arguments properly
- Edited
PepsiCola I missed your example
Finally you admitted at least one of your mistakes. But why you have to start blaming me for your fuck up? With a whole fucking essay, lol:
You admitted that you in the wrong, but you quickly shift to blame others, like "it's not my mistake - it's your stupidity" - judging by that one can safely assume that you have some narcissistic and some infantile traits - and that's actually makes a lot of sense, seeing how you tend to reply, shift blame and perceive other people's normal non-trolling posts as attack on your persona.
PepsiCola Because it doesn't contain arguments, you simply pulled a small part of my statement out of context
Lol. Your own quoted words are the argument by itself in that example.
You blame others for deflecting and deny when people point out that exact thing in your posts.
Do you understand how stupid that statement sounds? Like I don't even have to try to prove anything, because you already provide a solid example for my "case" on your deflections.
PepsiCola my full statement is longer and contain arguments
It contains nothing of value. Just you crying about jokes and your badge of "honor":
PepsiCola Stop trolling and manipulating, you have modified my statement
Most of your joke of a statements provided as is, and any one who interested could read the original, even though there's really nothing good to see there.
PepsiCola because in many threads, in many comments, many times I just beat you and your buddies on arguments easily
By shouting nonsense out loud? Nope. Stop living in a delusional fantasy world.
Your "ping-pong" comment is literally a fucking deflection: you got called out for deflecting - what did you do? Wrote an essay on how it's not you deflecting, but your "opponents" are, because they "invented" it.
Saying that you're not deflecting by writing a deflections, lol.
I don't even have to provide any counter-arguments because that statement of yours contains none of valid ones - and any person without a mental disability could easily see that.
PepsiCola And where is the argument here?
For what exactly? Why do I need to prove obvious things?
Most of people here voiced that they don't like your posts; you always cry about gang of trolls attacking you - well, do everybody a favor and quit it.
PepsiCola But then you say it's me who is deflecting, no mam, you are the genius who invented Ping-Pong
What a clown you are...
Lol. Yeah, we all in this together. We also have a very private discord server where we all meticulously discuss a plan of vendetta against you: some even suggest sending a real hit-squad, so, be wary.
For legal reasons: that is a joke.
PepsiCola They just saw me beating you on arguments, so they came to rescue you
Another one of your delusions, eh? The only person you've beaten here is yourself.
PepsiCola Because you are writing to me all the fucking time, despite I told you already 10 times to stop?
I mean, if you claim that you've already beaten me - then there's no point in responding to me further. But that's the thing: you didn't "beat" me. And with our new discovery in mind (one about your narcissism) we can easily see why you keep on replying.
PepsiCola I think it's a time to do a dontaion for a time machine for you that you can travel back in time to read my previous comments and arguments properly
I don't mind getting money for nothing, sign me up.
PepsiCola Stop deying the truth
It would've benn so good if you heeded those word yourself...
- Edited
Schizazoid Finally you admitted at least one of your mistakes.
Congratulations, you caught someone on a typo, the best catch of your entire life, you've been awarded from Second Lieutenant Idiot grade to First Lieutenant Idiot grade ! No to mention that's not the first, but the second thing to which I admitted, you moron.
Schizazoid But why you have to start blaming me for your fuck up? With a whole fucking essay, lol:
You admitted that you in the wrong, but you quickly shift to blame others, like "it's not my mistake - it's your stupidity" - judging by that one can safely assume that you have some narcissistic and some infantile traits - and that's actually makes a lot of sense, seeing how you tend to reply, shift blame and perceive other people's normal non-trolling posts as attack on your persona.
Wow, you're too stupid to even understand I wasn't blaming you for my typo in reading, because I already admitted it was my fault, which we both already agreed, and that what I was blaming you, was that you didn't even realise it was just a typo while reading, and not some big mistake like you wrongly thought, you were like an idiot who was looking in the mirror and was laughting at the one who he was seeing in the mirror, until he was told: hey idiot, it's you in the mirror, you are laughting of yourself !
Schizazoid Lol. Your own quoted words are the argument by itself in that example.
You blame others for deflecting and deny when people point out that exact thing in your posts.
You're still too stupid to understand that cutting out a part of a sentence is an ugly manipulation, or you're just trolling.
Schizazoid By shouting nonsense out loud? Nope. Stop living in a delusional fantasy world.
No, by arguments, like I already said.
Schizazoid For what exactly?
For countering my argument.
Schizazoid Most of people here voiced (...), do everybody a favor and quit it.
In the other thread you were already told to go PM with your personal vendetta, because you were littering a normal thread for other people, so do everybody a favor and quit.
Schizazoid What a clown you are...
Great argument on your side like usual, see mine: No, it's you who is the clown. So great like yours....
Schizazoid then there's no point in responding to me further.
I would like to stop to responding to you, but you write too many bulltshit / manipulations / trolling I need to correct, otherwise others might get manipulated by you and believe in your crap, so until you shut the fuck up, I most likely would need keep countering your bullshit for some time yet.
It's like reading War and P.eace
And you keep on charade of blameshift and deflections, lol: shouting out loud that someone else is an idiot, so people don't pay attention to your stink.
It doesn't really work though.
PepsiCola cutting out a part of a sentence is an ugly manipulation
Only if cutted out context contains something of value - your does not - still, people can look up original and proof read it themselves, if they feel like it.
PepsiCola by arguments
The only valid argument you ever had in conversing with me - is abour 17 and 34 min. matches. And even that one doesn't really have any kind of value in itself.
PepsiCola In the other thread you were already told to go PM with your personal vendetta, because you were littering a normal thread for other people, so do everybody a favor and quit.
Funny thing is: I immediately stopped "littering" said thread (even though said thread contains plenty of things to call out you for), whether you decided to write 2 more poems there, lol.
PepsiCola but you write too many bulltshit / manipulations / trolling
But that's the thing: I don't. All the things I called you out for - everybody that is not braindead can see them in your posts.
PepsiCola I would like to stop to responding to you
Yeah-yeah-yeah. You just couldn't resist - you had to write another essay on your flawless self and idiotic trolls that wrongfully trying to tarnish your image, eh?
Guess my theory about one little narcissist is quite close to reality.
jerc It's like reading War and P.eace
Don't forget to tip the authors
- Edited
It seems you're lacking real arguments more and more and you keep on charade of blameshift and deflections.
Schizazoid And you keep on charade of blameshift and deflections
You've just perfectly described what you keep doing all the time, the thread was over long time ago, then I just pasted a video for fun, unrelated to our conversation, and apart of several users posting single comments, you used it to rise from the grave and to continue your never ending personal vendetta, you must be one of the Russian trolls who graduated from a trolling school, the way you talk is like you play Ping-Pong ("It's you. No, it's you!").