• Players UT99
  • (cheater) player1 - and his huge number of frags/points

  • [deleted]

I didn't read any of it but... Player 1 a cheater? ROTFLOL

This is what happens happens in Democracy and its major flaw... the fucking Village IDIOT has the same VOTE weight as the normal person.

    [deleted]

    Many players when they see such a bizarre result for the first time with their eyes, the first thing they will think is that it must be a cheater, because a logical mind says that no fair player can achieve such bizzare results, especially when also seeing many other players calling "player1" a cheater and vote-kicking him.

    Even if "player1" is a fair and skilled player, I don't feel guilty nor I feel being an "fucking Village IDIOT", because it's not my fault that life is a bitch who cheats, makes jokes and is so fucking surprising, and you are still a bunch of fucked up trolls and fucking village idiots, because of your hate speech, trolling and personal attacks.

    And player_0 thinks Earth is flat, haha.

    [deleted] hmm I got interested in critique of democracy, then I read this. False alarm, no actual critique.

    Not to say I completely disagree with you. For instance a stupid vegetable vendor who makes vulgar noises to sell the vegies shouldn't be having same vote weight. That doesn't mean every fruit vendor should have less weight. Just specific entities with selfdestructive personality, in my books of course.

    WOW Cowboys analogies are just mind blowing. Yes Idiots and gross fruit salesman should have just as much say as anyone.

    There you have that folks, right from the great land!

    Remember we uncovered first (equal rights) in this thread. And we are out.

    Even if some maps have "exploits" where thanks to spawnkilling and camping, you can get bizarre points at scoreboard, doesn't mean that everyone must know about it or believe it at the first time, do people believe in every bizarre things in their life for the first time they see them? I don't think so...

    Seeing a speaking about democracy, (dedicated mainly to the_cowboy, because he seem to be a somehow smart guy who knows much about social aspects, but everyone can read if interested. ) 🙂

    In the past, people used to believe asstronomers and scientists that it's Sun which revolves / orbits / circles around Earth and called anyone who said otherwise an "idiot". Then XXX years later other asstronomers and scientists proved that the previous asstronomers and scientists were wrong in it's calculations and actually it is Earth which revolves around the Sun, which means that there were several hundred million "idiots" living in the world calling other people idiots, just because the other people didn't believe in what majority believed (that Sun resloves around Earth).

    And it's just one case of many cases where scientists were wrong.

    Another funny example is a group of people which thinks Earth is flat....
    But in this case, unlike the previous example, I don't think anybody will prove in future Earth is flat...

    It's funny but there also are cases where:

    • a group A of scientists "proved" some food X is harmful,
    • then after 10 years another group B of scientists proved it's not harmful,
    • and then after another 10 years another group C of scientists proved again the some food is harmful
    • and then after another 10 years another group D of scientists proved the opposite again

    Now, if anybody still always believe scientists in everything, then he must be an idiot.
    But also funny is that if you believe in nothing, you are still an idiot, because some things scientists say, are truth.
    The problem is which things scientits say, are truth, and which are not, we don't know, but even scientists themselves, don't know always either.

    And another example, similiar to Sun and Earth example : most people (8 billions) don't believe UFO., and will call everybody who says aliens exist an idiot, lets say after XXX years it turns out the aliens do exist, which means there were 8 billions "idiots" living on Earth (or more, because new people born since then).

    You have several choices: to believe in:

    • what YOU think is a truth,
    • what SOMEONE ELSE thinks is a truth
    • what MAJORITY thinks is a truth
    • what MINORITY thinks is a truth
    • what SCIENTIFISTS thinks is a truth

    A funny thing is, regardless of what the option above you choose, you still are an idiot, why? Because:

    • sometimes what YOU say is which s a truth,
    • sometimes what SOMEONE ELSE says is which s a truth,
    • other time what MAJORITY say is which is a truth,
    • other time what MINORITY say is which is a truth,
    • and another time what SCIENTIFISTS say is which is a truth.

    And you never know who says the truth.

    Only idiots believe in everything, why? Because not everything is a truth.
    Funny is that those who don't believe in anything are idiots too, why?
    Because something has to be true, can't be everything not a truth.
    I hope after reading it, your brain hasn't collapsed.

    Yes! It's very fascinating. Only the first two sentences. Because the one who stopped the sun and moved the earth was not some others but one man. Moreover, he was from your country. I didn't even read the rest because it didn't make sense. What and who do you want to impress?

      player_0 because the one who stopped the sun and moved the earth was not some others but one man.

      I DO KNOW, you "fucking Village IDIOT", that it was Nicolaus_Copernicus, I used the phrase "scientists and astronomers" just as a simplification, also considering the guy was studying works of other scientists and astronomers before and he gathered from it, also I don't see why it should make any difference, which proves even more that you cherry-picked it for the purpose of trolling.

      player_0 I didn't even read the rest because it didn't make sense.

      It didn't make sense only for you, and now after my explanation, the reason provided by you why it doesn't make sense for you, doesn't exist anymore, you've failed miserably with your trolling attempt, enjoy reading the rest of the article then. Also it's funny because additionally I've just proved that it's the reason you provided, what doesn't make sense, and that you are just trolling. What next are you going to find in my article to troll it, a typo? It's rather me who can ask you: what and who do you want to impress? What a stupid clown. HAHA.

      Just ignore this kid, he is like a mosquito that buzzes and distracts, enjoy my article.

      What a delusional clown you are, gonzales...
      You use "scientists" as an example - ok, let's elaborate on that. "Scientists" use knowledge that already exists and proven by many tests, they use intstruments that exists and also checked by said tests. They always limited in their tools, yet they push boundaries of said limitations and aquire more knowledge, design and implement more tools. They have set of rules on how theories must be constructed, how tests have to be structured etc.
      You on the other hand refuse to use knowledge that's already exists and proven by many people, you refuse to use modern and tested tools (in this example: demorec), refuse to abide by established set of rules that's proven to be much more effective (and just). You use derelict and inferior tool as a way of "prooving" that someone is cheating (screenshotting fucking scoreboard, ffs). You pretend to be good with math and statistics, while showing your incompetence with it (I already described how you didn't use all stats that are available to you).
      Hell, you show that you can't even fucking read properly with your "player_0 believes earth is flat", when he didn't say exactly that, but compared you to groop of flat-earthers. Time and time again you proove to people that you an idiot and shouldn't be taken seriosly.

      You said that I'm projecting, right? Well, surprise, little kid (that uses buzzword without knowing shit about it's meaning), evey human projects his psyche out in the world, and oh boy, I don't even know where to begin analysis on your "projections".
      I must say, that your behaviour looks a lot like denial: you are a bad player and you know that, but your ego can't take it, so you accuse of cheating any player that much better than you; people that don't agree with you - them you call idiots and trolls. Instead of reading valid arguments and reflecting upon it - you start childish reflecting "no, it is you idiot, not me".
      All of the above just bleeds insecurity and fragile ego, that defends itself by outright denying it's own flaws.
      I dare you: say "wall of shit" again without reading and reflecting upon it, proove me right once more.

        So you on drugs again, and another wall of shit from you and personal attack towards me, just after player_0, wow, you are talented and full of anger just like this troll player_0. I don't even understand what is the point of your wall of shit, because I just wrote an article about democracy as a response to a dicussion between The_Cowboy and jerc, just because I liked their conversation, this is a generic artile about democracy, how is it related to me? Why are you linking this to me? Just to have a reason to attack me?

        As for your accusations about demos and screenshoots, you must be an idiot, because, you just repeat the same accusations, which already Oo.er provided in his comment in this thread, and which I already adressed in my comment: HERE , read it because I'll not repeat myself twice.

        As for your another accusation, "what kind of player I am", you again repeat other's accusations, which I already addressed somewhere in this thread, and I'm already tired hearing it again, go find answers yourself.

        As for your accusation "player_0 thinks Earth is flat" you are too stupid to realise it was just a joke, you "fucking Village IDIOT", and not that I didn't understand what he means, it's you who didn't understand it was a joke.

        Schizazoid you start childish reflecting "no, it is you idiot, not me".

        No man, it's you and player_0 who are perfect examples of childish trolling.
        I used argumentation when I proved player_0 being an idiot, with his attack on my article and my person in his last comment, and now I've again used argumentation when have proved you are an idiot as well, with your attack on my person, in your comment. The point is you and player_0 will find WHATEVER reason to attack and troll me, including repeating other people's attacks, you both are full of anger, really, kind of borderline personality, "stop digging yourself deeper and deeper".

        Game over clown. Press Enter to start again.

          PepsiCola how is it related to me?

          I wrote how. You either didn't read and didn't reflect, or you just too dumb to understand/

          PepsiCola Just to have a reason to attack me?

          Yeah, attack you... Because everybody is out to troll you just because they want to.
          That's was sarcasm, btw.
          But seriously: you yourself give people plenty reason to "attack" you. Just in this thread you insulted me inbefore I said anything "bad" about you and then acted like it's alright and you are the victim here, lol.

          PepsiCola As for your accusations about demos and screenshoots,

          O-o-h, let's quote yourself then:

          PepsiCola a case with "player1" is the first case based only on a screenshoot + match stats

          So, my argument in this thread is still stands, lol.

          PepsiCola "what kind of player I am"

          Everybody can check your stats or watch you play. Sitting crouched in flagroom and spamming shockballs and combos on flagpole ain't exactly MLG strat.

          PepsiCola you are too stupid to realise it was just a joke

          If it is indeed a joke - that's one of the stupidest one I ever heard. Because it's doesn't even contain a joke. It's just dumb paraphraze of what he said.

          PepsiCola No man, it's you and player_0 who are perfect examples of childish trolling.

          Yeah, my "accusations" that are intertwined with valid arguments - it's just that - childish trolling. Ok.

          PepsiCola WHATEVER reason to attack and troll me

          You behave like an idiot and get offended when people treat you like one? Oh boy.

          Also, it's kinda hilarious reading "no you are" deflection after you quoted my point on that exact behaviour of yours.
          So, who's the clown here really? That's a rhethorical question.

            Relax and just let it go........

            He has victim syndrome, after I called him stupid because he gave crappy examples where he compared 36 mins to 17 mins as if he didn't have a math in school...also it was after others were already trolling and insulting me too much, so why should I be bothered if everybody, accepted such rules of a discsussion.

            Schizazoid O-o-h, let's quote yourself then: "PepsiCola: a case with "player1" is the first case based only on a screenshoot + match stats" So, my argument in this thread is still stands, lol.

            No, because you cheery-picked a single accidental case, and made a generic argument of it, as if I had always done that, it's a generalization / manipulation.

            Schizazoid Everybody can check your stats or watch you play. Sitting crouched in flagroom and spamming shockballs and combos on flagpole ain't exactly MLG strat.

            So you are repeating again someone's shitty accusations, repeating what EUOSH already alleged 2 times and which I already addressed HERE, so go and read it, because like I already said, I'll not repeat myself twice, and stop repeating other's accusations like Oo.er's and EUOSH's, start to read my replies, or go to an ophthalmologist, you're wasting my time, by the way, it's worth to read oOo's comment as well: HERE, as I partially share his opinion, also not to mention that often game is unplayable due to botters, spammers, campers, so why not to do same, but like EUOSH, you are blaming only me, and this is nothing more than personal attacking.

            Schizazoid If it is indeed a joke - that's one of the stupidest one I ever heard. Because it's doesn't even contain a joke. It's just dumb paraphraze of what he said.

            This joke was a form of banter / teasing with him.

            Schizazoid Yeah, my "accusations" that are intertwined with valid arguments - it's just that - childish trolling. Ok.

            I've just proved that your arguments are crap, you just repeat what others wrote without even reading my replies.

            Schizazoid You behave (...)

            The last several comments, it's you and player_0 who behave like idiots, at least he stopped as for now, but you continue.

              ...someone tell me that the descriptive form is not similar. 🙂

              PepsiCola He has victim syndrome

              Projecting much?

              PepsiCola also it was after others were already trolling and insulting me too much, so why should I be bothered if everybody

              If you can't control your behaviour and think inbefore speaking - you deserve all the shit you get here and anywhere else. Accept this rule of life, clown.

              PepsiCola No, because you cheery-picked a single accidental case

              It's not cherrypicking. I discuss case that is related to thread where I post. But you too "smart" to understand that simple thing.

              PepsiCola someone's shitty accusations

              Well, those accusations backed by your beloved statistic, so...

              PepsiCola I partially share his opinion

              If you don't care - either don't play, or don't post anything and just play. Simple as that.

              PepsiCola you are blaming only me

              I'm not blaming, I'm calling you out.
              If you were paying attention: I had banter twice with Player_0 - but at least he was smart enough to reflect on his own words, which you clearly don't do.

              PepsiCola This joke was a form of banter / teasing with him.

              Look, you just said an idiotic thing. There's no joke inside, no teasing: you only painted youself as stupid morron.
              And yeah:

              PepsiCola game is unplayable due to botters, spammers, campers, so why not to do same

              Gonzalez is cheater confirmed. Can we ban that guy?!
              See: that's how you do jokes, clown.

              PepsiCola I've just proved that your arguments are crap,

              You didn't prove anything at all. Stop living in a delusion, get a grip.

              PepsiCola it's you and player_0 who behave like idiots

              Well, I agree: because explaining anything to a delusional clown such as you is just dumb waste of time.

                Yeah, watch out, that guy has some crazy stand combo moves.